How Milan's Visual Archive Crisis Became a Problem Too Big to Ignore
From Brera's digitisation labs to the Porta Nuova construction hoarding boards, the city's rampant duplicate-image problem has a paper trail stretching back years.
From Brera's digitisation labs to the Porta Nuova construction hoarding boards, the city's rampant duplicate-image problem has a paper trail stretching back years.

Milan's public institutions and private developers are sitting on tens of thousands of duplicate, misattributed and legally ambiguous images — and the pressure to fix it has never been sharper. The immediate trigger is the Milan-Cortina 2026 Winter Olympics, now months away, which has forced every agency from the Comune di Milano to the Lombardy Regional Authority to audit the visual assets feeding into promotional campaigns, wayfinding systems and broadcast packages. What those audits found, according to planning documents reviewed by The Daily Milan, is a systemic failure that began well before anyone pencilled a bid into an IOC dossier.
The problem matters now for a simple commercial reason: Milan is a city that sells itself on images. The fashion houses along Via della Spiga, the architecture firms clustered around Porta Nuova, the Fuorisalone installations that take over the Tortona and Isola districts every April — all depend on clean, licensed, deduplicated visual assets to reach global buyers, press and tourists. When an image appears twice in an official presentation deck, or when the same photograph of Piazza Gae Aulenti is simultaneously licensed to the Comune and to a private developer under incompatible terms, the downstream legal exposure is real and, in some cases, already the subject of dispute.
The roots run back at least to 2018, when the Pinacoteca di Brera launched its first large-scale digitisation programme, scanning more than 38,000 works and associated documentary photographs. At the time, the project was considered a model for Italian cultural institutions. The difficulty emerged later: metadata standards were inconsistent across scanning batches, and by 2022 internal staff had flagged an estimated 4,200 near-duplicate image files sitting across three separate server environments, with no single authority responsible for deduplication or rights clearance. The Pinacoteca has not publicly confirmed or denied those internal figures, and The Daily Milan was unable to independently verify the precise count. What is on the public record is that the Ministry of Culture's national digitisation protocol, issued in January 2024, explicitly cited Italian museums as lagging on deduplication standards compared to institutions in Paris and Amsterdam.
Porta Nuova Garibaldi tells a parallel story. The mixed-use development, one of Europe's largest urban regeneration projects of the past two decades, has been documented obsessively — by architects, by the Comune's planning department, by Hines and Coima, the developers involved in different phases, and by dozens of contracted photographers hired at various stages since groundbreaking in 2009. By the time the district's visual archive was consolidated ahead of the 2026 Olympic marketing push, project managers reportedly discovered that multiple parties held conflicting licensing claims over cornerstone images of the Bosco Verticale towers. Again, The Daily Milan was not able to obtain the specific number of disputed files, but the existence of the licensing review is confirmed in publicly available tender documents published on the Comune di Milano procurement portal in March 2026.
The Milan-Cortina organising committee, Fondazione Milano Cortina 2026, set an internal deadline of 30 September 2026 for all partner agencies to deliver certified, deduplicated image libraries ready for broadcast licensing. That date, cited in the foundation's publicly available operational calendar, is now functioning as the de facto forcing mechanism across a much wider ecosystem than just sport. City Hall departments, the Metropolitana Milanese transport authority and even the Fiera Milano exhibition complex at Rho have all tied their own image governance reviews to the same deadline.
The practical consequence for anyone working with visual assets in Milan right now is straightforward. Organisations tendering for Olympic-affiliated contracts must demonstrate compliance with the ISO 19444 document management standard, which includes deduplication requirements. Freelance photographers and agencies working along the Via Tortona creative corridor have reported an uptick in rights-clearance requests from clients who would previously have moved faster and asked fewer questions. The longer-term effect may be a cleaner, better-documented visual record of one of Europe's most photographed cities — though getting there will require sustained investment in infrastructure that, until an Olympic bid forced the issue, no single body was willing to fund.
How does this story make you feel?
Spread the word
About this article
Published by The Daily Milan
Daily brief
Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.
More in News