A graphic designer working out of a shared studio on Via Tortona discovered in May that photographs of her product mock-ups had been lifted, duplicated, and were circulating on at least three separate e-commerce platforms under different brand names. She had never licensed the images. She had never been contacted. The copies were generating sales.
Her experience is not isolated. Across Milan's creative and commercial districts, from the ateliers of the Quadrilatero della Moda to the co-working spaces clustered around Piazza Gae Aulenti, professionals say the problem of duplicate image use — the unauthorised reproduction and redistribution of original visual content — has accelerated sharply in the first half of 2026, in step with the proliferation of AI-assisted publishing tools.
The issue lands with particular force in a city whose economy is built on the value of original aesthetics. Milan's fashion and design sector accounts for a significant share of Lombardy's export revenues, and the region's creative professionals have long treated proprietary imagery as both intellectual property and commercial currency. When that imagery gets duplicated and stripped of its origin, the damage runs deeper than bruised pride.
Voices From the Districts
On Corso di Porta Ticinese, the main artery running through the Navigli district, a bar owner who has run his venue since 2019 described finding photographs of his interior — taken by a professional photographer he paid personally — reproduced on a rival venue's promotional materials posted to social media. He contacted the platform in March. As of July, the images remain up.
A small ceramics label based in the NoLo neighbourhood, north of Loreto, reported a similar pattern. The brand's founder said she first noticed duplicate product images appearing on a Warsaw-based reseller's website in late 2025. By February 2026, the same images had appeared on two further sites, one registered in Cyprus and one with no traceable registration at all. The replicated listings undercut her retail price by roughly 30 percent.
The Camera Nazionale della Moda Italiana, which represents Italy's fashion sector and is headquartered in Milan, has flagged digital image rights as a growing concern for member brands in its communications to industry stakeholders, though the organisation has not yet published specific enforcement figures for 2026. The Politecnico di Milano's design faculty, meanwhile, incorporated a module on digital image provenance and watermarking into its 2025-26 postgraduate curriculum — an acknowledgment that the issue now requires formal professional training.
What Experts and Platforms Say the Next Steps Are
Under the European Union's Digital Services Act, which came into full effect for large platforms in February 2024, operators above defined user thresholds are required to provide accessible reporting mechanisms for intellectual property violations and to act on valid notices within specified timeframes. For Milan's creative community, the practical question is whether those mechanisms work quickly enough to matter commercially.
Lawyers specialising in IP at firms along Via Montenapoleone advise clients to register images with timestamped digital certificates before publication — a step that costs between €50 and €200 per batch depending on the service used, but which substantially strengthens any subsequent legal claim. Reverse-image search tools, some of which now offer continuous monitoring subscriptions starting at around €15 per month, have become standard recommendations for independent designers and small brands.
The Comune di Milano has not announced a dedicated programme to address the issue as of this writing, though the city's broader digital economy strategy, updated ahead of the Milan-Cortina 2026 Winter Olympics, includes language about supporting creative sector protections. Several affected professionals said they would welcome a centralised reporting and mediation desk, perhaps administered through the city's existing Sportello per le Imprese network, which already provides regulatory guidance to small businesses across the metropolitan area.
For the graphic designer on Via Tortona, the immediate goal is simpler: getting the copies down before a client notices and starts asking questions she cannot yet answer. She filed a formal DSA takedown notice in June. She is still waiting.